• Characterizing Baseflow Responses to Consecutive Events Using End-Member Mixing Analysis (EMMA)
  • Cho SungHyen1*, Kim Tae Seung1, Shin Woo Jin2, and Lee Ghwang-Sik2

  • 1National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (NICEM), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
    2Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), 162 Yeongudanji-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28119, Korea

  • EMMA 기법을 이용한 연속 강우 시 기저유출의 변동 이해
  • 조성현1*ㆍ김태승1ㆍ신우진2ㆍ이광식2

  • 1서울대학교 농생명과학공동기기원, 2한국기초과학지원연구원

  • This article is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study investigated the temporal evolution of baseflow and other runoff components during two consecutive rainfall events occurring at a two-day interval. End-Member Mixing Analysis (EMMA) was employed to assess the impact of antecedent rainfall on the subsequent event, alongside the characterization of hydrograph components. Environmental tracers, specifically stable isotopes (δ¹⁸O and δD) and dissolved silica (Si), were utilized to trace water origins and subsurface processes. Due to measurement limitations, the maximum silica concentration in the soil water component was estimated via a mass balance-based trial-and-error approach, which warrants further empirical validation. Hydrograph separation was performed using both 3-component (Event 1, Event 2, and baseflow) and 4-component (incorporating soil water) mixing models. The 4-component model provided a more physically plausible interpretation of baseflow dynamics; while the 3-component model attributed over 50% of the discharge to baseflow, the 4-component model revealed soil water as the dominant contributor. Furthermore, the results suggest that Event 1, which was 4.5 times larger than the subsequent event, had a persistent impact on streamflow during and beyond the second rainfall. This study confirms that streamflow is more significantly influenced by pre-event water (baseflow and soil water) than by direct event. The higher contribution of soil water relative to baseflow is attributed to the distinct hydraulic differences between fast-flow (soil water) and slow-flow (baseflow) regimes.


Keywords: Baseflow, Environmental Tracer, End-Member Mixing Analysis, Mass balance, slow-flow

This Article

  • 2025; 30(6): 131-138

    Published on Dec 31, 2025

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2025.30.6.131
  • Received on Dec 11, 2025
  • Revised on Dec 24, 2025
  • Accepted on Dec 31, 2025

Correspondence to

  • Cho SungHyen
  • National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (NICEM), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

  • E-mail: sunghc@snu.ac.kr