• A Feasible Study for the Usage of Sludge in Coal Mine Drainage as a Briquette Additive
  • Oh, Sae-Gang;Park, Chan-Ho;Kwak, Yong-Wan;Lee, Young-Jae;Lee, Hyun-Ju;Shim, Yon-Sik;Kwon, Hyun-Ho;Lee, Jai-Young;
  • Korea Resources Corporation;Korea Resources Corporation;Korea Resources Corporation;Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University;Mine Reclamation Corporation;Mine Reclamation Corporation;Mine Reclamation Corporation;Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul;
  • 석탄광산 배수슬러지의 연탄첨가물로서의 타당성 연구
  • 오세강;박찬오;곽용완;이영재;이현주;심연식;권현호;이재영;
  • 한국광물자원공사;한국광물자원공사;한국광물자원공사;고려대학교 지구환경과학과;한국광해관리공단;한국광해관리공단;한국광해관리공단;서울시립대학교 환경공학부;
Abstract
Possibility of the usage of sludge generated in coal mine drainage treatments as a briquette additive was investigated by the combination of industrial, elemental, and combustion experiments. A series of briquettes having 2% and 6% of sludge were used for the experiments. Compared to the control sample, our results show that all experimental values for the briquettes are very similar. In particular, it is worthy to note that there is no obvious difference in calorific values for the briquettes containing 2% or 6% of sludge. The calorific values are 4,250~4,360 kcal/kg, 4,240~4,250 kcal/kg, 4,180~4,210 kcal/kg, and 4,270~4,360 kcal/kg for the control sample, briquette containing 6% of Hambaek sludge, briquette containing 6% of Hamtae sludge, and briquette containing 2% of Hambaek sludge, respectively. Results of ash fusion temperature show that the temperature is greater than $1,550^{\circ}C$ for the control sample. However, the temperature for the briquettes with 6% of Hambaek sludge and 2% of Hambaek or Hamtae sludge is $1,510^{\circ}C$. For a briquette containing 6% of Hamtae sludge, the temperature of ash fusion is $1,530^{\circ}C$. After combustion, environmental impacts of the briquettes with sludge were tested. Little environmental influence was observed for the combusted briquettes with sludge.

Keywords: Coal mine drainage;Sludge;Briquette;Caloric value;Environmental impact;

This Article

  • 2010; 15(6): 72-80

    Published on Dec 31, 2010

  • Received on Sep 29, 2010
  • Accepted on Dec 4, 2010

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: