• Decrease in the Thickness of Capillary Fringe Induced by Surface Active Chemicals in the Groundwater
  • Kim, Heonki;Shin, Seungyup;Yang, Haewon;
  • Dept. of Environmental Sciences and Biotechnology, Hallym University, Institute of Energy and Environment, Hallym University;Dept. of Environmental Sciences and Biotechnology, Hallym University, Institute of Energy and Environment, Hallym University;Dept. of Environmental Sciences and Biotechnology, Hallym University, Institute of Energy and Environment, Hallym University;
  • 계면활성물질의 지하수적용에 의한 모관수대 두께의 감소
  • 김헌기;신승엽;양해원;
  • 한림대학교 환경생명공학과, 한림대학교 에너지.환경 연구소;한림대학교 환경생명공학과, 한림대학교 에너지.환경 연구소;한림대학교 환경생명공학과, 한림대학교 에너지.환경 연구소;
Abstract
Capillary fringe divides the groundwater and the vadose zone controlling the diffusive mass transfer of contaminants and gases. The thickness of capillary fringe is of great importance for the rate of contaminant mass transfer across the capillary fringe. Application of surface active chemicals including surfactants and alcohol-based products into the subsurface environment changes the surface tension of the aqueous phase, which in turn, affects the thickness of the capillary fringe. In this study, a bench-scale model was used to assess the quantitative relationship between the surface tension and the thickness of the capillary fringe. An anionic surfactant (Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, SDBS) and an aqueous solution of ethanol were used to control the surface tension of the groundwater. It was found that the thickness of the capillary fringe is directly proportional to the surface tension. The air entry pressures measured by the Tempe Pressure Cell at different surface tensions using SDBS (200 mg/L) and ethanol (20%, v/v) solutions were in good agreement with the thicknesses of the capillary fringe measured by the model. A simple method to correct the conventional Brooks-Corey model for estimating the air entry pressure was also presented.

Keywords: Aquifer;Capillary fringe;Anionic surfactant;Groundwater;Remediation;

This Article

  • 2012; 17(6): 52-58

    Published on Dec 31, 2012

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.6.052
  • Received on Oct 9, 2012
  • Revised on Nov 27, 2012
  • Accepted on Nov 28, 2012

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: