• Removal Characteristics of Organic Contaminants by Ultrasonic Soil Washing
  • Lim, Chan-Soo;Kim, Seog-Ku;Kim, Weon-Jae;Ko, Seok-Oh;
  • Civil Engineering Department, Kyung Hee University;Environment Engineering Research Div., Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology;Environment Engineering Research Div., Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology;Civil Engineering Department, Kyung Hee University;
  • 토양 세척 시 초음파 적용에 따른 유기 오염물 제거 특성 평가
  • 임찬수;김석구;김원재;고석오;
  • 경희대학교 토목공학과;한국건설기술연구원 수자원.환경연구본부;한국건설기술연구원 수자원.환경연구본부;경희대학교 토목공학과;
Abstract
Cavitation generated by ultrasonic irradiation can enhance the diffusional transport of organic contaminants from soil surfaces or pores. Therefore, ultrasound soil washing can be an alternative of traditional soil washing process. In this study, soil was artificially contaminated with n-tetradecane, n-hexadecane and phenanthrene. A plate type ultrasonic reactor at 25 kHz frequency and 1000W power was used for laboratory soil washing experiments. Ultrasonic soil washing efficiency was compared with those of traditional soil washing using mechanical mixing. Various operational parameter such as soil/liquid ratio, irradiation time, particle size, and soil organic matter content was tested to find out the optimum condition. It was found that ultrasonic soil washing demonstrates better performance than mechanical soil washing. Optimum soil:liquid ratio for ultrasonic soil washing was 1 : 5. Desorption of organic contaminants from soils by ultrasonic irradiation was relatively fast and reached equilibrium within 10 minute. However, decrease in the soil particle sizes by ultrasonic irradiation results in re-adsorption of contaminants to soil phase. It was also observed that soil particle size distribution and soil organic matter content have significant effects on the efficiency of ultrasonic soil washing.

Keywords: Ultrasound;Desorption;Soil Washing;Soil organic matter;Particle size distribution;

This Article

  • 2014; 19(6): 72-79

    Published on Dec 31, 2014

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2014.19.6.072
  • Received on Oct 17, 2014
  • Revised on Oct 30, 2014
  • Accepted on Nov 1, 2014

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: