• Role and Contaminant Selection Methods of Soil Quality Standards in Developed Countries
  • Jeong, Seung-Woo;An, Youn-Joo;Kim, Tae-Seung;
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University;Soil and Groundwater Divison. National Institute of Environmental Research;
  • 선진국 토양오염 기준의 역할과 기준항목 설정방법
  • 정승우;안윤주;김태승;
  • 군산대학교 환경공학과;건국대학교 환경과학과;국립환경과학원 토양지하수연구과;
References
  • 1. 국립환경과학원, 2007, 우선관리대상 토양오염물질 선정 연구. 선정기법 및 적용성 연구
  •  
  • 2. 환경부, 토양보전 기본계획 수립 연구, 2005
  •  
  • 3. ATSDR, 2005, 2005 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances That Will Be The Subject of Toxicological Profiles and Support Document, Division of Toxicology, Washington DC., USA
  •  
  • 4. Bbodschv, 1999, Federal Soil Protection And Contaminated Sites Ordinance, Germany
  •  
  • 5. California State, 2005, Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, California, USA
  •  
  • 6. CCME, 2003, Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Manitoba, Canada
  •  
  • 7. DEFRA, 2002a, Assessment of Risks to Human Health from Land Contamination: An Overview of the Development of Soil Guideline Values and Related Research, UK
  •  
  • 8. DEFRA, 2002b, Note on The Withdrawal of ICRCL Trigger Values, CLAN 3/02
  •  
  • 9. DEFRA, 2004, The First Soil Action Plan for England: 2004-2006-London, UK
  •  
  • 10. DEFRA, 2006, First Soil Action Plan for England: 2004-2006-Second Annual Report, London, UK
  •  
  • 11. Delaware State, Identification And Listing of Hazardous Waste, Delaware, USA
  •  
  • 12. DEPA, 2002, Guidelines on Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Danish Environmental Protection Agency
  •  
  • 13. Department of the Environment, 1995-96, Industry Profiles. Available for 47 different industrial activities from The Stationery Office, PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 lGN., U.K.
  •  
  • 14. Department of the Environment, 1991-95, Environmental Hazard Assessment for a Range of Substances, Reports TSD/1 to 24, Toxic Substances Division. U.K.
  •  
  • 15. EA 2002, Assessment of Risks to Human Health From Land Contamination: An Overview of the Development of Soil Guideline Values and Related Research, CLR 7., U.K.
  •  
  • 16. Florida State, 1998, Guidelines For The Management Of Recovered Screen Material From C&D Debris Recycling Facilities In Florida, Florida, USA
  •  
  • 17. Illinois EPA, 2007, Soil Remediation Objectivesa For Industrial/Commercial Properties/Residential Properties, Illinois, USA
  •  
  • 18. Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land, 1987 Guidance on the Assessment and Redevelopment of Contaminated Land, ICRCL Guidance Note 59/83, 2nd edn., U.K.
  •  
  • 19. Lewis R.J., 1992, Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 8th edn, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA
  •  
  • 20. Louisiana State, 2003, Underground Storage Tank Closure/Change-In-Service Guidance Document, Department of Environmental Quality, Louisiana, USA
  •  
  • 21. Maryland State, 2000, State of Maryland Department of The Environment Cleanup Standards For Soil And Groundwater, Maryland, USA
  •  
  • 22. Massachusetts State, 2006, Final Amendments Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 Cmr 40.0000, Massachusetts, USA
  •  
  • 23. MDNR, 2001, Clean up Levels for Missouri-Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater Cleanup Standards, Missouri Department of Natural Resources
  •  
  • 24. Ministry Of The Environment Government of Japan, 2005, Soil Contamination Countermeasures, Japan
  •  
  • 25. Mississippi State, 2002, Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation Procedures For Voluntary Cleanup And Redevelopment Of Brownfield Sites, USA
  •  
  • 26. NEPC, 1999, Schedule B(I) Guideline On The Investigation Levels F or Soil And Groundwater, Australia
  •  
  • 27. New Jersey State, 1999, Soil Cleanup Criteria, New Jersey, USA
  •  
  • 28. New York State, 2006, Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives Technical Support Document, New York State Department of Health, USA
  •  
  • 29. Oregon State, 1998, Guidance For Ecological Risk Assessment: Levels I, Ii, Iii, Iv, Oregon, USA
  •  
  • 30. SAEFL, 1998, Derivation of trigger and clean up values for inorganic pollutants in the sol, Switzerland
  •  
  • 31. SFT, 1999, Guidelines For The Risk Assessment Of Contaminated Sites, Norway
  •  
  • 32. Texas State, 2001, Guidance For Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments At Remediation Sites In Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, USA
  •  
  • 33. USEPA, 1996, Soil Screening Guidance : User’s Guide, Washington DC, USA
  •  
  • 34. Virginia State, 2006, Universal Treatment Standards, Depatment of Environmental Quality, Virginia, USA
  •  
  • 35. VROM, 2000, Circular On Target Values And Intervention Values For Soil Remediation (Ministerie Van Volkshuisvesting. Ruimtelijke Ordening En Milieubeheer)
  •  

This Article

  • 2009; 14(1): 18-28

    Published on Feb 28, 2009

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: