• Study on Determination of Permissible Soil Concentrations for Explosives and Heavy Metals
  • Kim, Moonkyung;Jung, Jae-Woong;Nam, Kyoungphile;Jeong, Seulki;
  • Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, Seoul National University;Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Seoul Center, Korea Basic Science Institute;
  • 화약류 및 중금속의 인체위해성평가 및 생태독성에 기반한 토양허용농도도출에 관한 연구
  • 김문경;정재웅;남경필;정슬기;
  • 서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 농생명과학대학 농생명과학공동기기원;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;한국기초과학지원연구원 서울센터;
References
  • 1. An, Y.J., Lee, W.M., Nam, S.H., and Jung, S.W., 2010, Proposed approach of Korean ecological risk assessment for the derivation of soil quality criteria, J. Soil Groundw. Envion., 15(3), 7-14.
  •  
  • 2. Efroymson, R.A., Will, M.E., Suter, G.W., and Wooten, A.C., 1997a. Toxicological benchmarks for screening contaminants of potential concern for effects on terrestrial plants: 1997 Revision, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. ES/ER/TM-85/R3.
  •  
  • 3. Efroymson, R.A., Will, M.E., and Suter, G.W., 1997b. Toxicological benchmarks for contaminants of potential concern for effects on soil and litter invertebrates and heterotrophic process: 1997 Revision, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. ES/ER/TM-126/R2.
  •  
  • 4. Environment Canada, 2014, Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators, available at http://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&n=9E3E5354-1 (accessed June, 2015).
  •  
  • 5. Farmer, A., Lee, R., Loutseti, S., Stanley, K., Warinton, J., and Whitehouse, P., 2010, Setting Environmental Standards within a Socio-economic Context, Chapter 2 in Derivation and Use of Environmental Quality and Human Health Standards for Chemical Substances in Water and Soil, CRP Press, NV, USA, 5 p.
  •  
  • 6. Greenslade, P. and Vaughan, G.T., 2003, A comparison of Collembola species for toxicity testing of Australian soils, Pedobiologia, 47(2), 171-179.
  •  
  • 7. Hsieha, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-H., Ryan, D.K., and Pancorbo, O.C., 2004, Toxicity of the 13 priority pollutant metals to Vibrio fisheri in the Microtox chronic toxicity test, Sci. Total Environ., 320, 37-50.
  •  
  • 8. Jang, J.Y., Cho, S.N., Kim, S.Y., Kim, S.J., and Jung, H.G., 2007, Korean coefficient handbook, Ministry of Environment.
  •  
  • 9. Johnston, C.D., 2010, Contaminated site remediation: From source zones to ecosystems Volume 1, Centre for Groundwater Studies, CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag No. 5, Wembley, W.A., 6913, Australia.
  •  
  • 10. Kim S.W., Kwak J.I., Yoon J.Y., Jung S.W., and An Y.J., 2014, Selection of domestic test species suitable for Korean soil ecological risk assessment. J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng., 36(5), 359-366.
  •  
  • 11. KMA, 2014, available at http://kma.go.kr
  •  
  • 12. Lachance, B., Bergeron, P.-M., Berube, V., Sunahara, G.I., and Robidoux, P.Y., 2008, Validation of environmental military threshold values for explosives in soil, Applied Ecotoxicology Group, Biotechnology Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, NRC #49926.
  •  
  • 13. Lee, K.Y., Moon, D.H., Kim, K.W., Cheong, K.H., Kim, T.S., Khim, J, Moon, K.R., and Choi, S.B, 2011, Application of waste resources for the stabilization of heavy metals (Pb, Cu) in firing range soils, J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng., 33(2), 71-76.
  •  
  • 14. Merrington, G., Boekhold, S., Haro, A., Knauer, K., Romijn, K., Sawatsky, N., Schoeters, I., Stevens, R., and Swartjes, F., 2010, Derivation and Use of Environmental Quality and Human Health Standards for Chemical Substances in Groundwater and Soil Chapter 5 in Derivation and Use of Environmental Quality and Human Health Standards for Chemical Substances in Water and Soil, CRP Press, NV, USA, 105 p.
  •  
  • 15. KMOE, 2005, The development of hybrid electrokinetic remediation technique using solar energy on shooting range soils contaminated by heavy metals.
  •  
  • 16. KMOE, 2009, Research on military environment management and its development.
  •  
  • 17. KMOE, 2015, Guidance of soil contaminants risk assessment, ME notification 2015-64.
  •  
  • 18. NIER, 2014a, Regulation of specific method for risk assessment of chemicals, NIER notification 2014-48.
  •  
  • 19. NIER, 2014b, Soil Groundwater Information System, available at http://sgis.nier.go.kr
  •  
  • 20. Suter, G.W. and Tsao, C.L., 1996, Toxicological benchmarks for screening potential contaminants of concern for effects on aquatic biota: 1996 revision, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, ES/ER/TM-96/R2.
  •  
  • 21. Swartjes, F.A., Rutgers, M., Lijzen, J.P.A., Janssen, P.J.C.M., Otte, P.F., Wintersen, A., Brand, E., and Posthuma, L., 2012, State of the art of contaminated site management in The Netherlands: Policy framework and risk assessment tools, Sci. Total Environ., 427-428, 1-10.
  •  
  • 22. TTCP (The Technical Cooperation Program), 2009, available at http://www.em-guidelines.org/ecot.htm (accessed June, 2015).
  •  
  • 23. US Army, 1999, Installation restoration program management plan, US Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Probing Ground, Maryland, USA.
  •  
  • 24. US Army, 2009, Program management manual for Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP), US Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Probing Ground, Maryland, USA.
  •  
  • 25. USEPA, 1989, Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part A), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/1-89/002.
  •  
  • 26. USEPA, 1991a, Human health evaluation manual, supplemental guidance: "Standard default exposure factors", Washington, DC, USA, OSWER Directive 9285.6-03.
  •  
  • 27. USEPA, 1991b, Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part B), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/R-92/003.
  •  
  • 28. USEPA, 2004, Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part E), Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9285.7-02EP.
  •  
  • 29. USEPA, 2009, Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part F), Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9285.7-82.
  •  
  • 30. USEPA, 2005, Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels (revised), Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER Directive 9285.7-55.
  •  
  • 31. USEPA, 2014, Human health evaluation manual, supplemental guidance: Update of standard default exposure Factors, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, OSWER Directive 9200.1-120.
  •  
  • 32. USEPA, 2015a, Regional screening levels for chemical contaminants at superfund sites, available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/Generic_Tables/index.htm (accessed June, 2015).
  •  
  • 33. USEPA, 2015b, Regional screening levels for chemical contaminants at superfund sites, available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/equations.htm (accessed June, 2015).
  •  
  • 34. Van Beelen, P. and Fleuren-Kemila, A.K., 1999, A comparison between toxicity tests using single species and a microbial process, Chemosphere, 38(14), 3277-2390.
  •  

This Article

  • 2015; 20(6): 19-27

    Published on Nov 30, 2015

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.6.019
  • Received on Oct 1, 2015
  • Revised on Nov 5, 2015
  • Accepted on Nov 20, 2015

Correspondence to

  • E-mail: