• Quantification of Diesel in Soils using the Partitioning Tracer Method with Two-dimensional Soil Box
  • Rhee, Sung-Su;Lee, Gwang-Hun;Park, Jun-Boum;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • 분배성 추적자 기법을 이용한 디젤 오염 토양의 정량적 오염도 평가에 관한 2차원 토조 실험 연구
  • 이성수;이광헌;박준범;
  • 서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부;
Abstract
The partitioning tracer method is to estimate the residual saturation of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) in soils by analyzing tracer's retardation induced by the reversible partitioning of tracer with NAPL. This study is to estimate the residual diesel saturation in soils using the partitioning tracer method. Two-dimensional soil box was used to represent the 2-dimensional flows of groundwater and tracer solution in the saturated aquifer, and the soil box was filled with soil and then saturated with water. The residual diesel saturation was induced in saturated soil, and the partitioning tracer method was applied. The results from batch-partitioning experiment indicated that the diesel-water partitioning was linear with respect to tracer's concentration, and the partition coefficient of tracer between diesel and water was measured by their linearities. The groundwater flow in the saturated aquifer was simulated in the 2-dimensional soil box, and the residual diesel contamination was visually identified. The results from the partitioning tracer method with or without diesel in soils confirmed that 4-methyl-2-pentanol, 2-ethyl-1-butanol and 1-hexanol, can be used as a detecting method for diesel contamination. By the accuracies of estimations for diesel contamination using the partitioning tracer method, 2-ethyl-1- butanol showed the highest accuracy with 83%.

Keywords: Soil contamination;LNAPL;Diesel;Partitioning tracer method;2-D soil box experiment;

References
  • 1. Annable, M.D., Rao, P.S.C., Hatfield, K., Graham, W.D., Wood, A.L., and Enfield, C.G, 1998, Partitioning tracers for measuring residual NAPL: Field-scale test results, J. Environ. Eng., 124, 498-503.
  •  
  • 2. Bedient, P.B., Rifai, H.S., and Newell, C.J., 1999, Groundwater Contamination: Transport and Remediation (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  •  
  • 3. Brusseau, M.L., Nelson, N.T., and Cain, R.B., 1999, The partitioning tracer method for In-situ detection and quantification of immiscible liquids in the subsurtace, in: Innovative Subsurfacc Remediation, Field Testing of Physical, Chemical, and Characterization Technologies, ACS Symposium Series 725, American Chemical Society, Washington, p. 208-225.
  •  
  • 4. Cain, R,B., Johnson, G.R., McCray, J.E., Blanford, W.J., and Brusseau, M.L., 2000, Partitioning tracer test for evaluating remediation performance, J. Ground Water, 38, 752-761.
  •  
  • 5. Cheon, J.Y., Lee, J.Y., and Lee, K.K., 2004, Characterization of the hydrogeologic environment at a petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated site in Korea, Environ. Geol., 45, 869-883.
  •  
  • 6. Dai, D., Barranco, Jr.F.T., and Illangasekare, T.H., 2001, Partitioning and interfacial tracers for differentiating NAPL entrapment configuration: Column-scale investigation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4894-4899.
  •  
  • 7. Davis, B.M., Istok, J.D., and Semprini, L., 2002, Push-pull partitioning tracer tests using radon-222 to quantify non-aqueous phase liquid contamination, J. Contam. Hydrol., 58, 129-146.
  •  
  • 8. Devine, C.E., McCray, J.E., Martin, L.M.W., Blanford, W.J., Blitzer, D.J., Brusseau, M.L., and Boving, T.B., 2004, Partitioning tracer tests as a remediation metric: Case study at naval amphibious base little creek, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Remediation, J, 14, 7-31.
  •  
  • 9. Domenico, P.A. and Schwartz, F.W., 1997, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology (2nd ed.), Wiley, New York.
  •  
  • 10. Fetter, C.W., 2001, Contaminant Hydrogeology (4th ed.), Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  •  
  • 11. Jha, R., Singh, V.P., and Vatsa, V., 2008, Analysis of urban development of Haridwar, India, using entropy approach, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 12, 281-288.
  •  
  • 12. Jin, M., Delshad, M., Dwarakanath, V., McKinney, D.C., Pope, G.A., Sepehmoori, K., Tilburg, C.E., and Jackson, R.E., 1995, Partitioning tracer test for detection, estimation, and remediation performance assessment of subsurface nonaqueous phase liquids, Water Resour: Res., 31, 1201-1211.
  •  
  • 13. Jones, E.H. and Smith, C.C., 2005, Non-equilibrium partitioning tracer transport in porous media: 2-D physical modeling and imaging using a partitioning fluorescent dye, Water Res., 39, 5099-5111.
  •  
  • 14. Lee, J.Y., Cheon, J.Y., Lee, K.K., Lee, S.Y., and Lee, M.H., 2001, Factors affecting the distribution of hydrocarbon contaminants and hydrogeochemical parameters in a shallow sand aquifer, J. Contam. Hydrol., 50, 1539-1583.
  •  
  • 15. Nelson, N.T. and Brusseau, M.L., 1996, Field study of the partitioning tracer method for detection of dense nonaqueous phase liquid in a trichloroethene-contaminated aquifer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2859-2863.
  •  
  • 16. Nelson, N.T., Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T.W., and Brusseau, M.L., 1999, Partitioning tracer method for the in situ measurement of DNAPL saturation: Influence of heterogeneity and sampling method, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 4046-4053.
  •  
  • 17. Rao, P.S.C., Annable, M.D., and Kim, H., 2000, NAPL source zone characterization and remediation technology performance assessment: Recent developments and applications of tracer techniques, J. Contam. Hydrol., 45, 63-78.
  •  
  • 18. Son, Y., Oh, M., and Lee, S., 2009, Influence of diesel fuel contamination on the electrical properties of unsaturated soil at a low frequency range of 100 Hz-10 MHz, Environ. Geol., 58, 1131-1348.
  •  
  • 19. Young, C.M., Jackson, R.E., Jin, M., Londergan, J.T., Mariner, P.E., Pope, G.A., Anderson, F.J., and Houk, T., 1999, Characterization of a TCE NAPL zone in alluvium by partitioning tracers, Ground Water Monit. Remediat., 19, 84-94.
  •  

This Article

  • 2010; 15(1): 66-72

    Published on Feb 28, 2010

  • Received on Feb 3, 2010
  • Revised on Feb 19, 2010
  • Accepted on Feb 24, 2010