• Analysis on Monitoring Results of Korean Soil Monitoring Network
  • Jeong, Seung-Woo;
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University;
  • 토양측정망 운영 결과 분석 연구
  • 정승우;
  • 군산대학교 환경공학과;
Abstract
Usability of soil quality monitoring network for ascertaining soil quality changes was evaluated by analysing soil quality monitoring results. Tolerance limits of soil quality monitoring results from 1997 to 2007 were calculated and compared with Korean soil quality standards. This study determined that soil quality was changed if the upper 95% tolerance limit value was greater than the soil quality standard. Fluoride most frequently exceeded the soil quality standard and nickel, zinc, arsenic, copper, lead and cadmium were followed. Analysis on land use showed that tolerance limits of industrial land use most frequently exceeded the soil quality standards and residential, road and various land uses then frequently exceeded. Tolerance limits of land uses expecting high contaminant loads frequently exceeded the soil quality standards. This fact imply that the soil quality monitoring network generates reasonable data to represent change in Korean soil quality. This study also suggested that representative sampling from well identified points should be done to improve data reliability and accurately ascertain soil quality changes.

Keywords: Soil quality monitoring network;Soil quality standard;Land use;

References
  • 1. 박용하, 1997, 토양질측정자료의 관리체계 구축방안, 우선관리대상 토양오염물질 선정 연구: 선정기법 및 적용성 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원, p.50.
  •  
  • 2. 임성재, 2007, 토양 및 지하수수질 보전제도 분석과 관리개선방안-토양 및 지하수수질 측정망 운영체계 중심으로, 연세대학교 보건대학원, p.65.
  •  
  • 3. 환경부, 2005, 2004년도 토양측정망 및 실태조사 결과
  •  
  • 4. 환경부, 2007a, 환경백서
  •  
  • 5. 환경부, 2007b, 2006년도 토양측정망 및 실태조사 결과
  •  
  • 6. 환경부, 2008a, 2007년도 토양측정망 및 실태조사 결과
  •  
  • 7. 환경부, 2008b, 토양측정망 재평가 및 확대 관리방안 연구, p.143.
  •  
  • 8. 황상일, 김훈미, 이양희, 2006, 효율적인 오염토양부지 정보관리체계 구축방안: 국내외 현황 및 시사점, 지히수토양환경, 11(6), 1-7.
  •  
  • 9. McBean, E.A. and Rovers, F.A., 1998, Statistical Procedures for Analysis of Environrnental Monitoring Data & Risk Assessment, Prentice Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 99.
  •  

This Article

  • 2010; 15(2): 18-23

    Published on Apr 30, 2010

  • Received on Jul 27, 2009
  • Revised on Aug 28, 2009
  • Accepted on Feb 25, 2010