• Existing Forms of Heavy Metals in the Vicinity of a Smelter
  • Woo, Sang-Duck;Kim, Geon-Ha;Kim, Young-Jin;Nam, Kyoung-Phile;
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hannam University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hannam University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University;
  • 제련소 주변토양 중금속 존재형태
  • 우상덕;김건하;김영진;남경필;
  • 한남대학교 건설시스템공학과;한남대학교 건설시스템공학과;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;서울대학교 건설환경공학부;
Abstract
Heavy metals in soils exist in various forms dependent upon surrounding conditions. As the Janghang smelter area is of concern for its high elevated heavy metal concentrations, Korean government decided to remediate the area. Main objectives of this research were; to analyze heavy metal concentrations and their existing forms in the vicinity of the smelter; and to understand differences made by analysis techniques of heavy metals. Top soils of rice field, crop field, bare field, and forestry in the area were sampled and analyzed for their physicochemical characteristics. Concentrations of Cu, Cd, Pb, and As were analyzed with two pretreatment techniques adopted using 0.1 N HCl and aqua regia. To analyze existing forms of heavy metals, Tessier's schemes for sequential extraction technique were adopted. Exchangeable fraction and carbonate bound fraction of heavy metals may pose potential threat to environment and were in the order of Pb > As > Cu > Cd. If assessing mobile fraction of heavy metals by land uses, the order was forestry > bare land > crop field > rice field. When analyzed using Tessier's scheme, high ratio of residual fractions to total arsenic concentration should be considered for remediation design of the area.

Keywords: Arsenic;Heavy metals;Land use;Sequential extraction;Smelter;Soil;

References
  • 1. 국립환경과학원, 2005, 토양오염기준 평가 및 확립에 관한 연구 (II), 2005-08-753
  •  
  • 2. 서지원, 2007, 울산 달천광산 토양내 중금속의 존재형태 및 오염도 연구, 석사학위논문, 대전대학교.
  •  
  • 3. 환경부, 2008, (구)장항제련소 주변지역 주민건강영향조사 결과 환경부보도자료
  •  
  • 4. 환경부, 2009a, 토양보전법 기본계획, 발간등록번호11-1480000-001048-01, p. 70-73.
  •  
  • 5. 환경부, 2009b, 토양환경보전법 시행규칙 일부개정령, 환경부령 제 333호.
  •  
  • 6. 환경부, 2009c, 2008년도 토양측정망 및 토양오염 실태조사결과, 발간등록번호 11-1480000-000669-10.
  •  
  • 7. Anju, M. and Banerjee, D.K., 2010, Comparison of two sequential extraction procedures for heavy metal partitioning in mine tailings, Chemosphere, 78(11), 1393-1402.
  •  
  • 8. Eltantaway, I.N. and Arnold, P.W., 1973, Reappraisal of ethylene glycol mono-ethyl ether (EGME) method for surface area estimation of clays, Soil Science. 24, 232-238.
  •  
  • 9. Loeppert, R.H. and Suarez, D.L., 1996, Carbonate and Gypsum, Method of Soil Analysis: 3. Chemical Analysis., Soil Science Society of America, 437-474.
  •  
  • 10. Sahuquillo, A. and Lopez-Sanchez, J. F., 1999, Use of a certified reference material for extractable trace metals to assess sources of uncertainty in the BCR three-stage sequential extraction procedure, Analytica Chimica Acta, 382(3), 317-327.
  •  
  • 11. Summer, M.E. and Miller, W.P., 1996, Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients, Method of Soil Analysis: 3. Chemical Analysis, Soil Science Society of America, 1201-1229.
  •  
  • 12. Swift, R.S., 1996, Organic matter characterization."Method of Soil Analysis: 3. Chemical Analysis., Soil Science Society of America, 1011-1069.
  •  
  • 13. Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., and Bisson, M., 1979, Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51(7), 844-850.
  •  
  • 14. Thomas, G.W., 1996, Soil pH and soil acidity, Method of Soil Analysis:3. Checmical Analysis, Soil Science Society of America, 475-490.
  •  

This Article

  • 2010; 15(5): 16-22

    Published on Oct 31, 2010

  • Received on Jul 16, 2010
  • Accepted on Sep 16, 2010