• Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils by Pilot Scale Biopile
  • Yoon, Jeong Ki;Noh, Hoe-Jung;Kim, Hyuk;Kim, Jong Ha;Kim, Tae Seung;Ko, Sung Hwan;
  • National Institute of Environmental Research;National Institute of Environmental Research;National Institute of Environmental Research;National Institute of Environmental Research;National Institute of Environmental Research;EcoPhile Co.;
  • Pilot 규모 biopile에 의한 유류오염토양의 정화
  • 윤정기;노회정;김혁;김종하;김태승;고성환;
  • 국립환경과학원;국립환경과학원;국립환경과학원;국립환경과학원;국립환경과학원;에코필;
Abstract
The pilot scale biopile system was designed and operated for evaluation of bioremediation efficiency for petroleum contaminated soil. The pilot scale biopile consisted of biopile dome, aeration system and monitoring system and two biopiles were operated with nutrients and inoculum for more 100 days. The test pile A and B were analyzed with regard to pH, total carbon contents, water contents, nutrients (N, P) and TPH. The initial TPH concentrations for pile A and pile B were about 10,000 mg/kg and 2,300 mg/kg, respectively. After 100 days, the TPH contents decreased about 70% in the pile A and 30% in the pile B. Also, n-$C_{17}$/pristane and n-$C_{18}$/phytane ratios in all pile were significantly changed. The microbial densities in the pile A was increased by approximately $10^7$ CFU/g-soil~$10^8$ CFU/g-soil, but there was almost no changed in the pile B. The average biodegradation rates were calculated about 66.8 mg/kg-day in the pile A and 10.9 mg/kg-day in the pile B. Over the course of operation period, pile temperature was considered the major limiting factor for the efficiency of all biopiles.

Keywords: Biopile;Petroleum contaminated soil;TPH;Biodegradation;

References
  • 1. APHA, AWWA and WEF, 1998, Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. APHA, Washington, D.C.
  •  
  • 2. Fahnestock, F.M., Wickramanayake, G.B., Kratzke, R.J., and Major, W.R., 1998, Biopile Design, Operation, and Maintenance Handbook for Treating hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils, Battelle Press.
  •  
  • 3. Filauro, G., Andreotti, G., Arlotti, D., and Reisinger, H.J., 1998, Blow out of Trecate 24 crude oil well: how bioremediation techniques are solving a major environmental emergency in a valuable agricultural area. In Contaminated Soil 98, Thomas Telford, London, p. 403-412.
  •  
  • 4. Filler, D.M., Lindstrom, J.E., Braddock, J.F., Johnson, R.A., and Nickalaski, R., 2001, Integral biopile components for successful bioremediation in the Arctic, Cold Regions Sci. Technol., 32, 143-156.
  •  
  • 5. Grishchenkov, V.G., Townsend, R.T., McDonald, T.J., Autenrieth, R.L., Bonner, J.S., and Boronin, A.M., 2000, Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by facultative anaerobic bacteria under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, Proc. Biochem., 35, 889-896.
  •  
  • 6. Hayes, K.W., Meyers, J.D., and Huddleston, R.Y., 1995, Biopile Treatability, Bioavailability, and Toxicity Evaluation of a Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soil. In: Hinchee, R.E., Kittel, J.A., Reisinger, H.J., Applied Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 249-256.
  •  
  • 7. Jorgensen, K.S., Puustinen, J., and Suortti, A.-M., 2000, Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles, Environ. Pollut., 107, 245-254.
  •  
  • 8. Kodres, C.A., 1999, Coupled water and air flows through a bioremediation soil pile, Environ. Modelling Soft., 14, 37-47.
  •  
  • 9. Lepo, J.E. and Cripe, C.R., 1999, Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) form crude oil in sandy-beach microcosms. In: Bell, C.R., Brylinsky, M., Johnson-Green, P., Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology., Atlantic Canada Society for Microbial Ecology, Halifax, Canada.
  •  
  • 10. Li, L., Cunningham, C.J., Valerie Pas, Philp J.C., Barry, D.A., and Anderson, P., 2004, Field trial of a new aeration system for enhancing biodegradation in a biopile, Waste Manage., 24, 127-137.
  •  
  • 11. Margesin, R., Zimmerbauer, A., and Schinner F., 2000, Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities, Chemosphere, 40, 339-346.
  •  
  • 12. MOE, 2009, Soil Official Method in Korea.
  •  
  • 13. NIAST, 1988, Soil Chemistry Analytical Method.
  •  
  • 14. Porta, A., Trovato, A., McCarthy, K., Uhler, A., and Andreotti, G., 1997, Degradation of saturated and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and formation of their metabolites in bioremediated crude oil-containing soils. In: Alleman, B.C., Leeson, A. (Eds.), In Situ and On-site Bioremediation: Vol. 1. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, p. 505-510.
  •  
  • 15. Sanscartier D., Zeeb B., Koch I., and Reimer K., 2009, Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil by heated and humidified biopile system in cold climates, Cold Regions Sci. Technol. 55, 167-173.
  •  
  • 16. Song, H.-G., Wang, X., and Bartha, R., 1990, Bioremediation potential of terrestrial fuel spills, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 652-656.
  •  
  • 17. Tamburini, D., 1997, Evaluation of optimum hydrocarbon degradation conditions: a biotreatability study. In: Alleman, B.C., Leeson, A. (Eds.), In situ and On-site Bioremediation, 1. Battelle Press, Columbus, USA, p. 467-472.
  •  
  • 18. Wrenn, B.A. and Venosa, A.D., 1996, selective enumeration of aromatic and aliphatic degrading bacteria by a most-probable-number procedure, Can. J. Microbiol., 42, 252-258.
  •  
  • 19. Yeom, I.T., Heo, S.C., Lee, S.H., and Ahn, K.H., (1999), Treatment of Diesel-Contaminated Soil Using a Biopile, KSCE J. Civil Eng., 19(4), 523-531.
  •  

This Article

  • 2013; 18(2): 10-18

    Published on Apr 30, 2013

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2013.18.2.010
  • Received on Nov 14, 2012
  • Revised on Mar 11, 2013
  • Accepted on Mar 22, 2013