• A Comparative Study on Forecasting Groundwater Level Fluctuations of National Groundwater Monitoring Networks using TFNM, ANN, and ANFIS
  • Yoon, Pilsun;Yoon, Heesung;Kim, Yongcheol;Kim, Gyoo-Bum;
  • Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources;Geowater+ Research Center, K-water Institute;
  • TFNM, ANN, ANFIS를 이용한 국가지하수관측망 지하수위 변동 예측 비교 연구
  • 윤필선;윤희성;김용철;김규범;
  • 한국지질자원연구원 지구환경연구본부;한국지질자원연구원 지구환경연구본부;한국지질자원연구원 지구환경연구본부;K-water연구원;
Abstract
It is important to predict the groundwater level fluctuation for effective management of groundwater monitoring system and groundwater resources. In the present study, three different time series models for the prediction of groundwater level in response to rainfall were built, those are transfer function noise model (TFNM), artificial neural network (ANN), and adaptive neuro fuzzy interference system (ANFIS). The models were applied to time series data of Boen, Cheolsan, and Hongcheon stations in National Groundwater Monitoring Network. The result shows that the model performance of ANN and ANFIS was higher than that of TFNM for the present case study. As lead time increased, prediction accuracy decreased with underestimation of peak values. The performance of the three models at Boen station was worst especially for TFNM, where the correlation between rainfall and groundwater data was lowest and the groundwater extraction is expected on account of agricultural activities. The sensitivity analysis for the input structure showed that ANFIS was most sensitive to input data combinations. It is expected that the time series model approach and results of the present study are meaningful and useful for the effective management of monitoring stations and groundwater resources.

Keywords: Groundwater level;Transfer function noise model;Artificial neural network;Adaptive neuro fuzzy interference system;

References
  • 1. Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M., 1976, Time Series Analysis- Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day, San Francisco, California, USA, 575 p.
  •  
  • 2. Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Aravena, R., and Bobee, B., 2001, Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resour. Res., 37(4), 885-896.
  •  
  • 3. French, M.N., Krajewski, W.F., and Cuykendall, R.R., 1992, Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. J. Hydrol., 137(1-4), 1-31.
  •  
  • 4. Herrera, L.J., Pomares, H., Rojas, I., Guillen, A., Prieto, A., and Valenzuela, O., 2007, Recursive prediction for long term time series forecasting using advanced models. Neurocomputing, 70(16-18), 2870-2880.
  •  
  • 5. Hipel, K.W., Mcleod, A.I., and Lennox, W. C., 1977, Advances in Box-Jenkins modeling: 1. Model construction, Water Resour. Res., 13(3), 567-575.
  •  
  • 6. Hong, Y.S.T. and White, P.A., 2009, Hydrological modeling using a dynamic neuro-fuzzy system with on-line and local learning algorithm, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 110-119.
  •  
  • 7. Hu, T.S., Lam, K.C., and NG, S.T., 2005, A modified neural network for improving river flow prediction, Hydrol. Sci. J., 50(2), 299-318.
  •  
  • 8. Jang, J., 1993, ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE T. on syst. man cyb., 23(3), 665-685.
  •  
  • 9. Ji, Y., Hao, J., Reyhani, N., and Lendasse, A., 2005, Direct and recursive prediction of time series using mutual information selection, Lect. notes comp. sc., 3512, 1010-1017.
  •  
  • 10. Karunanithi, N., Grenney, W.J., Whitley, D., and Bovee, K., 1994, Neural networks for river flow prediction, J. of Comp. Civil Eng., 8(2) 201-220.
  •  
  • 11. Kisi, O. and Shiri, J., 2012, Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for predicting water table depth fluctuations, Hydrol. Res., 43(3), 286-300.
  •  
  • 12. Knotters, M. and Bierkens, M.F.P., 2000, Physical basis of time series models for water table depths, Water Resour. Res., 36(1), 181-188.
  •  
  • 13. Maier, H.R. and Dandy, G.C., 2000, Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications, Environ. Modell. Softw., 15, 101-124.
  •  
  • 14. Mohanty, S., Jha, M.K., Kumar, A., and Sudheer, K.P., 2010, Artificial neural network modeling for groundwater level forecasting in a river island of eastern India, Water Resour. Manag., 24(9), 1845-1865.
  •  
  • 15. Rai, S.N. and Singh, R.N., 1995, Two-dimensional modelling of water table fluctuation in response to localized transient recharge, J. Hydrol., 167, 167-174.
  •  
  • 16. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., and The PDP Research Group, 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 516 p.
  •  
  • 17. Tankersley, C.D., Graham, W.D., and Hatfield, K., 1993, Comparison of univariate and transfer function models of groundwater fluctuations, Water Resour. Res., 29, 3517-3533.
  •  
  • 18. van Geer, F.C. and Zuur, A.F., 1997, An extension of Box-Jenkins transfer/noise models for spatial interpolation of groundwater head series, J. Hydrol., 192, 65-80.
  •  
  • 19. Yi, M.J., Kim, G.B., Sohn, Y.C., Lee, J.Y., and Lee, K.K., 2004, Time series analyses for the groundwater level in the National Groundwater Monitoring Network, J. Geol. Soc. Korea, 50(2), 293-307.
  •  
  • 20. Yi, M.J. and Lee, K.K., 2004, Transfer function-noise modeling of irregularly observed groundwater heads using precipitation data, J. Hydrol., 288, 272-287.
  •  
  • 21. Yoon, H., Jun, S.-C., Hyun, Y., Bae, G.-O., and Lee, K.-K., 2011, A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer, J. Hydrol., 396(1-2), 128-138.
  •  
  • 22. Yoon, H., Kim, Y., Ha, K., and Kim, G.B., 2013, Application of groundwater-level prediction models using data-based learning algorithms to National Groundwater Monitoring Network data, J. Eng. Geol., 23(2), 137-147.
  •  
  • 23. Zealand, C.M., Burn, D.H., and Simonovic, S.P., 1999, Shortterm streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks, J. Hydrol., 214(1-4), 32-48.
  •  

This Article

  • 2014; 19(3): 123-133

    Published on Jun 30, 2014

  • 10.7857/JSGE.2014.19.3.123
  • Received on May 2, 2014
  • Revised on May 22, 2014
  • Accepted on May 22, 2014