• A Comparison Study of Various Water Sources for Feasibility of Expanding the use of Groundwater in Public Water Supply of South Korea
  • Cha, Eun-Jee;Hyun, Yunjung;
  • Korea Environment Institute;Korea Environment Institute;
  • 지하수 상수원 활용의 타당성 고찰을 위한 상수도 취수원의 특성 비교 연구
  • 차은지;현윤정;
  • 한국환경정책평가연구원;한국환경정책평가연구원;
Abstract
As water sources become more vulnerable to the effects of climate change such as drought and contamination, the diversification of water sources is important for securing water supply. This study examines the properties of five water sources for public supply, including river and river-bed water, dams, reservoirs, and groundwater, while ensuring that the quantities available from such sources are stable and the water itself is safe for use. This study also analyzes the power, chemical, repair and maintenance, and labor costs associated with each water source. The results demonstrate that groundwater has high potential as a water source because it is readily available (about $12.89billion\;m^3/yr$), but only a small portion of it is currently used. Analyses indicated that groundwater is the most efficient source of water to meet water demand below $1,000,000m^3/yr$, which covers 62.5% of water supply facilicities. With the implementation of groundwater dams, groundwater can become cost-efficient even for larger water demand. Additionally, the water source protection areas are the smallest for groundwater among the five water sources. In conclusion, the use of groundwater as an alternative water source is feasible becasue it is readily available, safe, cost-efficient, and requires the lowest amount of environmental regulations for the diversification of water supply sources.

Keywords: Groundwater;Public water supply;Diversification of water sources;Water security;Cost-efficient;

References
  • 1. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2010, Waterworks facility standard.
  •  
  • 2. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2013, 2011 Waterworks Statistics.
  •  
  • 3. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2014, 2012 Waterworks Statistics.
  •  
  • 4. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2015a, 2013 Waterworks Statistics.
  •  
  • 5. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2015b, "Status of Water Source Protection Area(2014)", www.me.go.kr [accessed 17.08.03]
  •  
  • 6. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2016a, 2014 Waterworks Statistics.
  •  
  • 7. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2016b, Enforcement Rule for Water Sources Management, Article 3.
  •  
  • 8. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2016c, 2025 National Waterworks Master Plan.
  •  
  • 9. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2017a, 2015 Waterworks Statistics.
  •  
  • 10. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2017b, 2017 White Paper of Environment.
  •  
  • 11. Ministry of Government Legislation, Water Works Act, Article 3, paragraph (2), www.law.go.kr [accessed 17.08.18]
  •  
  • 12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT), 2011, Water Resources Long-Term Master Plan for Basic Plan (2012-2021).
  •  
  • 13. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), 2012, Groundwater Management Basic Plan (2012-2021).
  •  
  • 14. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), 2015, 2025 Basic Plan of Waterworks Maintenance.
  •  
  • 15. Park, S., 2005, A Quantitative analysis of economies of scale in the water industry in Korea, Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(2), 1-19.
  •  

This Article