• Performance Analysis of Ground Heat Exchanger in Combined Well and Open-Closed Loops Geothermal (CWG) System
  • Park, Youngyun;Song, Jae-Yong;Lee, Geun-Chun;Kim, Ki-Joon;Mok, Jong-Koo;Park, Yu-Chul;
  • Department of Geology and Geophysics, Kangwon National University;SanHa E&C Co., Ltd.;SanHa E&C Co., Ltd.;SanHa E&C Co., Ltd.;Geo3eco Co., Ltd.;Department of Geology and Geophysics, Kangwon National University;
  • 밀폐형과 개방형이 결합된 복합지열시스템의 지중열교환기 성능 분석
  • 박영윤;송재용;이근춘;김기준;목종구;박유철;
  • 강원대학교 지질지구물리학부;(주)산하이앤씨;(주)산하이앤씨;(주)산하이앤씨;(주)지오쓰리에코;강원대학교 지질지구물리학부;
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate performance of geothermal heat exchanger (GHE) in the combined well and open-closed loops geothermal (CWG) systems. The CWG systems were designed to combine open loop geothermal heat pumps and closed loop geothermal heat pumps for high energy efficiency. GHE of the CWG systems could be installed at pumping wells for agricultural usage. To get optimal heat exchange capacity of GHE of the CWG systems, 4 GHEs with various materials and apertures were tested at laboratory scale. Polyethylene (PE) and stainless steel (STS) were selected as GHE materials. The maximum heat exchange capacity of GHEs were estimated to be in the range of 33.0~104 kcal/min. The heat exchange capacity of STS GHEs was 2.4~3.2 times higher than that of PE GHE. The optimal cross section area of GHE and flow rate of circulating water of GHE were estimated to be $2,500mm^2$ and 113 L/min, respectively. For more complicated GHE of the CWG systems, it is necessary to evaluate GHEs at various scales.

Keywords: Combined well and open-closed loop geothermal system;Geothermal heat exchanger;Open loop geothermal heat pump;Closed loop geothermal heat pump;Circulating water;

References
  • 1. Bae, S., Kim, H., Kim, H., and Nam, Y., 2017, Hydraulic feasibility study on the open-loop geothermal system using a pairing technology, KIEAE J., 17, 119-124.
  •  
  • 2. Chang, J.H., Park, D.H., Park, S.S., and Na, S.M., 2010, Evaluation of application of effective hydraulic conductivity in SCW ground heat pmmp system, 2010 Korea Geo-Environmental Society Fall Conference, Seoul, p.141-146.
  •  
  • 3. ETB (Engineering ToolBox), 2017, www.engineeringtoolbox.com [accessed 17.07.04]
  •  
  • 4. Jeong, E.M., Lee, W.Y., and Oh, S.I., 2010, A study on energy use of the farmers. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Seoul, 65 p.
  •  
  • 5. Jo, Y.J., Lee, J.Y., Lim, S.Y., and Hong, G.P., 2009, A review on potential effects of installation and operation of ground source heat pumps on soil and groundwater environment, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 14, 22-31.
  •  
  • 6. KOSIS (Korean Statistical information service), 2017, kosis.kr [accessed 17.07.04]
  •  
  • 7. Kwon, K.S., Lee, J.Y., and Mok, J.K., 2012, Update of current status on ground source heat pumps in Korea, J. Geol. Soc. Korea, 48, 93-199.
  •  
  • 8. NREC (New & Renewable Energy Center), 2016, www.knrec.or.kr. [accessed 17.07.04]
  •  
  • 9. Park, Y., Mok, J.K., Jang, B.J., Lee, J.Y., and Park, Y.C., 2015, Influence of closed loop ground source heat pumps on groundwater: a case study, J. Geol. Soc. Korea, 51, 243-251.
  •  
  • 10. Sohn, B.H. and Shin, H.J., 2006, Thermal conductivity measurement of grouting materials for ground heat exchanger borehole, Korean J. Air-Cond. Refrig. Eng., 18, 493-500.
  •  
  • 11. Song, Y. and Lee, T.J., 2015, Geothermal development in the Republic of Korea: Country update 2010-2014, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne.
  •  

This Article