Abstract
References
Information
The main objective of this study is to assess the compatibility between Korean ministry of environment (KME) standard and ISO (KS I ISO) standard for the determination of BTEX and TPH content in soil. We carried out comparison analysis for both methods using CRM and matrix spiked samples. In case of GC-MS analysis for BTEX, we got statistically (significance level: 0.05) the same results from KME standard (ES 07600.1) and ISO standard (KS I ISO 15009). However, it showed statistically (significance level: 0.05) different results when TPH was analyzed by KME standard (ES 07552.1) and ISO standard (KS I ISO 16703). To clarify the reason why both methods produced different results for TPH content, we also did some additional experiments in terms of differences in extraction, clean-up and target hydrocarbon range. Extraction with polar and non-polar compounds mixed solvent (acetone+n-heptane) of KS I ISO 16703 showed higher extraction efficiency than with only non polar solvent (dichloromethane) extraction of ES 07552.1 by about 9%. While column type clean-up of KS I ISO 16703 showed the reduction in TPH content between before and after clean-up, batch type of clean-up of ES 07552.1 did not show any changes in TPH content through clean-up process. The target hydrocarbon range of ES 07552.1 and KS I ISO 16703 is $C_8{\sim}C_{40}$ and $C_{10}{\sim}C_{40}$ , respectively. From this point of view, kerosene and JP-8 contaminated soil showed higher RPD (relative producibility deviation) values between results by both method than that of lubricant or diesel contaminated soil. The higher content of hydrocarbon ($C_8{\sim}C_{10}$ ) in kerosene and JP-8 played an important role in increasing RPD values in addition to the effects caused by different solvents and clean-up method. Consequently, it was concluded that both methods (ES 07552.1 and KS I ISO 16703) were not compatible.
- 국가표준인증종합정보센터, 2012, http://www.standard.go.kr
- 국립농업과학원, 2012, http://soil.rda.go.kr/webgis/webgis.jsp
- 김태승, 이정희, 김연호, 황승율, 장준영, 박완모, 조희정, 김창희, 신선경, 김삼권, 나진균, 2002, 미규제 미량유기오염물질 분석기법 개발에 관한 연구(IV), 국립환경연구원보, 24, 43-55.
- 류순호, 2000, 토양사전, 서울대학교출판부, p. 473-477.
- 박동준, 강인선, 2009, WTO/TBT 협정에 따른 기술규제 동향과 대응방안:기술표준에 의한 생산성 제고 관점, 생산성논집, 23(4), 379-339.
- 법제처, 2012, 환경분야시험검사 등에 관한 법률(법률 제11266호).
- 이군택, 2004, 적용된 분석방법 차이에 따른 토양 중 풍화 경유 함량 비교, 지하수토양환경, 9(3), 33-37.
- 전홍석, 이재준, 고광백, 1998, 환경통계학, 동화기술, p. 163-175.
- 환경부, 2009, 토양오염공정시험기준(환경부고시 제2009-255호).
- Cole, G.M., 1994, Assessment and Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 65.
- Florida, D.E.P., 1995, Method for determination of petroleum range organics (method #FL-PRO).
- ISO, 2012, http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/list_of_iso_technical_committees.htm
- Koch, M., Liebich, A., Win, T., and Nehls, I., 2005, Certified reference materials for the determinatin of mineral oil hydrocarbons in water, soil and waste, BAM, Germany.
- KS I ISO 15009, 2004, 토양의 질 - 가스크로마토그래프를 이용한 휘발성 방향족 탄화수소, 나프탈렌, 휘발성 할로겐 족 탄화수소 화합물 정량 - 열 탈착 퍼지 트랩.
- KS I ISO 16703, 2005, 토양의 질-가스크로마토그래프를 이용한 C10-C40 범위의 탄화수소 함량 측정.
- prEN 14039, 2000, Characterization of waste: Determination of hydrocarbon content in the range of
$C_{10}$ to$C_{40}$ by gas chromatography. - Sui, H., Xingang, L, and Du, Y., 2011, Factors controlling complex solvent extraction of petroleum hydrocarbons contaminated soil, Proceedings of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting, AIChE, Minneapolis, USA.
- Publisher :The Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment
- Publisher(Ko) :한국지하수토양환경학회
- Journal Title :Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
- Journal Title(Ko) :지하수토양환경
- Volume : 17
- No :4
- Pages :63 ~ 72
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.4.063


Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment





