All Issue

2024 Vol.29, Issue 6
31 December 2024. pp. 1-11
Abstract
References

References

1

Acosta-Martinez, V. and Tabatabai, M.A., 2000, Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 31, 85-91.

10.1007/s003740050628
2

Besalatpour, A., Hajabbasi, M.A., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H., and Dorostkar, 2011, Landfarming process effects on biochemical properties of petroleum-contaminated soils, Soil Sediment Contam., 20(2), 234-248.

10.1080/15320383.2011.546447
3

Bergsveinson et al., 2019, Spatial analysis of a hydrocarbon waste-remediating landfarm demonstrates influence of management practices on bacterial and fungal community structure, Microb. Biotechnol., 12(6), 1199-1209.

10.1111/1751-7915.13397
4

Blonska, E., 2010, Enzyme activity in forest peat soils. Folia Forestalia Polonica. Series A. Forestry, 52(1), 20-25.

5

Borsook, H. and Keighley, G. 1933, Oxidation-reduction potential of ascorbic acid (vitamin C), PNAS, 19(9), 875-878.

10.1073/pnas.19.9.875
6

Cardoso, E.J.B.N., Vasconcellos, R.L.F., Bini, D., Miyauchi, M.Y.H., Santos, C.A.D., Alves, P.R.L., Paula, A.M.D., Nakatani, A.S., Pereira, J.D.M., and Nogueira, M.A., 2013, Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health?, Sci. Agric., 70, 274-289.

10.1590/s0103-90162013000400009
7

Das, S.K. and Varma, A., 2011, Role of enzymes in maintaining soil health, Soil Enzymology, 22, 25-42.

10.1007/978-3-642-14225-3_2
8

Deng, A., Wu, X., Su, C., Zhao, M., Wu, B., and Luo, J., 2021, Enhancement of soil microstructural stability and alleviation of aluminium toxicity in acidic latosols via alkaline humic acid fertiliser amendment, Chem. Geol., 583, 120473.

10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120473
9

Dissanayake, N. and Hoy, J.W., 1999, Organic material soil amendment effects on root rot and sugarcane growth and characterization of the materials, Plant Dis., 83(11), 1039-1046.

10.1094/pdis.1999.83.11.1039
10

Doran, J.W. and Zeiss, M.R., 2000, Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality, Appl. Soil Ecol., 15(1), 3-11.

10.1094/pdis.1999.83.11.1039
11

Eissenstat, D.M., 1991, On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: A field study using citrus rootstocks, New Phytol., 118, 63-68.

10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00565.x
12

Garbuz, S., Mackay, A., Camps-Arbestain, M., DeVantier, B., and Minor, M., 2021, Biochar amendment improves soil physico-chemical properties and alters root biomass and the soil food web in grazed pastures, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 319, 107517.

10.1016/j.agee.2021.107517
13

Garcia-Gil, J.C., Plaza, C., Senesi, N., Brunetti, G., and Polo, A.A., 2004, Effects of sewage sludge amendment on humic acids and microbiological properties of a semiarid Mediterranean soil, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 39, 320-328.

10.1007/s00374-003-0709-z
14

Han, S.H., Jung, M.C., Kim, J.W., Jeon, S.W., Nguyen, Q.T., Yoon, K.W., and Min, S.K., 2020, The occurrence and treatment status of off-site contaminated soils in Korea, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 25(4), 1-6.

10.7857/JSGE.2020.25.4.001
15

Huang, H., Liu, H., Zhang, R., Chen, Y., Lei, L., Qiu, C., and Xu, H., 2022, Effect of slow-released biomass alkaline amendments oyster shell on microecology in acidic heavy metal contaminated paddy soils, J. Environ. Manage., 319, 115683.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115683
16

Kandeler, E., Tscherko, D., and Spiegel, H., 1999, Long-term monitoring of microbial biomass, N mineralization and enzyme activities of a chernozem under different tillage management, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 28, 343-351.

10.1007/s003740050502
17

Knight, A., Cheng, Z., Grewal, S.S., Islam, K.R., Kleinhenz, M.D., and Grewal, P.S., 2013, Soil health as a predictor of lettuce productivity and quality: a case study of urban vacant lots, Urban Ecosys., 16, 637-656.

10.1007/s11252-013-0288-1
18

Karlen, D.L., Veum, K.S., Sudduth, K.A., Obrycki, J.F., and Nunes M.R., 2019, Soil health assessment: Past accomplishments, current activities, and future opportunities, Soil Tillage Res., 195, 104365.

10.1016/j.still.2019.104365
19

Kandeler, E. and Gerber, H., 1988, Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 6(1), 68-72.

10.1007/bf00257924
20

Khati, P., Chaudhary, P., Gangola, S., Bhatt, P., and Sharma, A., 2017, Nanochitosan supports growth of Zea mays and also maintains soil health following growth, Biotech., 7, 1-9.

10.1007/s13205-017-0668-y
21

Kramer-Walter, K.R., Bellingham, P.J., Millar, T.R., Smissen, R.D., Richardson, S.J., and Laughlin, D.C., 2016, Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum, J. Ecol., 104, 1299-1310.

10.1111/1365-2745.12562
22

Lee, S.H., Lee, J.H., Jung, W.C., Park, M., Kim, M.S., Lee, S.J., and Park, H., 2020, Changes in soil health with remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soils using two different remediation technologies, Sustainability, 12, 10078.

10.3390/su122310078
23

Lee, W. C., Lee, J.H., Lee, S.H., Lee, S.W., Jeon, J.H., Lee, S.H., and Kim, S.O., 2022, Revitalization of total petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil remediated by landfarming, Toxics, 10(3), 147.

10.3390/toxics10030147
24

Lichtenthaler, H.K., 1987, Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes, Methods Enzymol., 148, 350-382.

10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
25

Lobet, G., Pages, L., and Draye, X., 2011, A novel image-analysis toolbox enabling quantitative analysis of root system architecture, Plant Physiol., 157, 29-39.

10.1104/pp.111.179895
26

Nelson, P.N. and Su, N., 2010, Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils, Soil Res., 48(3), 201-207.

10.1071/sr09150
27

NIFS (National Institute of Forest Science), 2014, Soil and Plant Analytical Method, 11-1400377-000748-01 (in Korean).

28

O'Brien, P.L., DeSutter, T.M., Casey, F.X.M., Khan, E., and Wick, A.F., 2018, Thermal remediation alters soil properties - a review, J. Environ. Manage., 206,826-835.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.052
29

OECD, 2003, OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Terrestrial Plant Test, 208: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test.

10.1787/9789264070066-en
30

Pape, A., Switzer, C., Mccosh, N., and Knapp, C., 2015, Impacts of thermal and smouldering remediation on plant growth and soil ecology, Geoderma, 243, 1-9.

10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.004
31

Park, H., Kang, S., and Bae, B., 2021, Quantifying inhibitory effects of reclaimed soils on the shoot and root growth of legume plant lentil (Lens culinaris), J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 26(5), 1-8.

10.7857/JSGE.2021.26.5.001
32

Pepper, I.L. and Gerba, C.P., 2004, Environmental microbiology: A laboratory manual, 2nd Ed., Elsevier Academic Press, MA, USA.

33

Premalatha, K., Botlagunta, N., Santhosh, D., Hiremath, C., Verma, R.K., Shanker, K, Sundaresana, V., and Kalra, A., 2021, Enhancement of soil health, germination and crop productivity in Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees, an important medicinal crop by using a composite bio inoculant, J. Plant Nutr., 44, 2331-2346.

10.1080/01904167.2021.1899207
34

Reinersmann, T., Herre, M., Marschner, B., and Heinze, S., 2023, Soil enzyme activity response to substrate and nutrient additions on undisturbed forest subsoil samples, Soil Syst., 7(2), 57.

10.3390/soilsystems7020057
35

Riegel, C. and Noe, J.P., 2000, Chicken litter soil amendment effects on soilborne microbes and Meloidogyne incognita on cotton, Plant Dis., 84(12), 1275-1281.

10.1094/pdis.2000.84.12.1275
36

Sainju, U.M., Liptzin, D., and Dangi, S.M., 2022, Enzyme activities as soil health indicators in relation to soil characteristics and crop production, Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ., 5(3), e20297.

10.1002/agg2.20297
37

Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., and Eliceiri, K.W., 2012, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9(7), 671-675.

10.1038/nmeth.2089
38

Stott, D.E., 2019, Recommended soil health indicators and associated laboratory procedures, Soil Health Technical Note No. 450-03. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

39

U.S. EPA, 2017, How to evaluate alternative cleanup technologies for underground storage tank sites, EPA 510-B-17-003.

40

Utobo, E.B. and Tewari, L., 2015, Soil enzymes as bioindicators of soil ecosystem status, Appl. Ecol. Rnviron. Res., 13(1), 147-169.

10.15666/aeer/1301_147169
41

Wang, C., Li, Z., Shen, J., Li, Y., Chen, D., Bolan, N., Li, Y., and Wu, J., 2023, Biochar amendment increases the abundance and alters the community composition of diazotrophs in a double rice cropping system, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 59(8), 873-886.

10.1007/s00374-023-01756-y
42

Wani, P.A., Khan, M.S., and Zaidi, A. 2008, Impact of zinc-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on lentil grown in zinc-amended soil, Agron. Sustainable Dev., 28(3), 449-455.

10.1051/agro:2007048
43

Zhao, Y. and Naeth, M.A., 2022, Lignite derived humic products and cattle manure biochar are effective soil amendments in cadmium contaminated and uncontaminated soils, Environ. Adv., 8, 100186.

10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100186
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지하수토양환경학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
  • Journal Title(Ko) :지하수토양환경
  • Volume : 29
  • No :6
  • Pages :1-11
  • Received Date : 2024-11-06
  • Revised Date : 2024-11-23
  • Accepted Date : 2024-11-29