All Issue

2023 Vol.28, Issue 1S1 Preview Page
31 January 2023. pp. 18-39
Abstract
References
1

Aderemi, B., Olwal, T., Ndambuki, J., and Rwanga, S., 2022, A review of groundwater management models with a focus on IoT-Based systems, Sustainability, 14(1), 148.

10.3390/su14010148
2

Abd El-Aziz, A.A., Alsalem K.O., and Mahmood, M.A, 2021, An intelligent groundwater management recommender system, Indian J. Sci. Technol., 14(37), 2871-2879.

10.17485/IJST/v14i37.1332
3

Ahn, E., 2021, Analysis of digital twin technology trends related to geoscience and mineral resources after the Korean new deal policy in 2020, Econ. Environ. Geol., 54(6), 659-670.

10.9719/EEG.2021.54.6.659
4

Ahn, J.J., Kim, Y.M., Yoo, K., Park, J., and Oh, K.J., 2012, Using GA-Ridge regression to select hydro-geological parameters influencing groundwater pollution vulnerability, Environ. Monit. Assess., 184, 6637-6645.

10.1007/s10661-011-2448-1
5

Amini, M., Abbaspour, K., and Johnson, C., 2010, A comparison of different rule-based statistical models for modeling geogenic groundwater contamination, Environ. Model. Softw., 25(12), 1650-1657.

10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.05.014
6

Bowes, B.D., Sadler, J.M., Morsy, M.M., Behl, M., and Good-all, J.L., 2019, Forecasting groundwater table in a flood prone coastal city with long short-term memory and recurrent neural networks, Water, 11(5), 1098.

10.3390/w11051098
7

Chang, H., Moon, B., Yoon, S., and Jin, T., 2017, Development and performance evaluation of multiple sensor for groundwater quality monitoring and remote control system using IoT, J. Korea Inst. Inf. Commun. Eng., 21(10), 1957-1963.

8

Chen, C., He, W., Zhou, H., Xue, Y., and Zhu, M., 2020, A comparative study among machine learning and numerical models for simulating groundwater dynamics in the Heihe River Basin, northwestern China, Scientific Reports, 10, 3904.

10.1038/s41598-020-60698-932127583PMC7054559
9

Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., and Bobée, B., 2000, Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach, J. Hydrol., 203(3-4), 244-257.

10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00214-6
10

Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., and Bobee, B., 2001a, Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(5).

10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:5(367)
11

Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Aravena, R., and Bobee, B., 2001b, Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations, Water Resour. Res., 37(4), 885-896.

10.1029/2000WR900368
12

Coyte, R.M., Singh, A., Furst, K.E., Mitch, W.A., and Vengosh, A., 2019, Co-occurrence of geogenic and anthropogenic contaminants in groundwater from Rajasthan, India. Science of the Total Environment, 688, 1216-1227.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.334
13

Cristaldi, L., Ferrero, A., Macchi, M., Mehrafshan, A., and Arpaia, P., 2020, Virtual Sensors: a Tool to Improve Reliability, 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT, 10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT48571.2020.9138173.

10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT48571.2020.9138173
14

Daliakopoulos, I., Coulibaly, P., and Tsanis, I., 2005, Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks, J. Hydrol., 309(1-4), 229-240.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.001
15

Drage, J. and Kennedy, G., 2020, Building a low-cost, internet-of-things, real-time groundwater level monitoring Network, Ground Water Monit. Remediat., 40(4), 67-73.

10.1111/gwmr.12408
16

Edmunds, W.M., Shand, P., Hart, P., and Ward, R.S., 2003, The natural (baseline) quality of groundwater: a UK pilot study, Science of the Total Environment, 310(1-3), 25-35.

10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00620-4
17

Frederick, L., VanDerslice, J., Taddie, M., Malecki, K., Gregg, J., Faust, N., and Johnson, W., 2016, Contrasting regional and national mechanisms for predicting elevated arsenic in private wells across the United States using classification and regression trees, Water Research, 91, 295-304.

10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.023
18

Goodall, J., Horsburgh, J., Whiteaker, T., Maidment, D., and Zaslavsky, I., 2008, A first approach to web services for the National Water Information System, Environ. Model. Softw., 23(4), 404-411.

10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.01.005
19

Hussein, E., Thron, C., Ghaziasgar, M., Bagula, A., and Vaccari, M., 2020, Groundwater prediction using machine-learning tools, Algorithms, 13(11), 300.

10.3390/a13110300
20

Jeong, J. and Park, E., 2019, Comparative applications of data-driven models representing water table fluctuations, J. Hydrol., 572, 261-273.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.051
21

Jeong, J., Park, E., Chen, H., Kim, K., Han, W., and Suk, H., 2020a, Estimation of groundwater level based on the robust training of recurrent neural networks using corrupted data, J. Hydrol., 582 124512.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124512
22

Jeong, J., Jeong, J., Park, E., Lee, B., Song, S., Han, W., and Chung, S., 2020b, Development of an efficient data-driven method to estimate the hydraulic properties of aquifers from groundwater level fluctuation pattern features, J. Hydrol., 590, 125453.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125453
23

Jeong, J., Jeong, J., Lee, B., and Song, S., 2021, The applicability of conditional generative model generating groundwater level fluctuation corresponding to precipitation pattern, Econ. Environ. Geol., 54(1), 77-89.

10.9719/EEG.2021.54.1.77
24

Jeong, J., Choung, S., Jeong, D., Kim, M., Kim, H., and Kim, J., 2022, Development of data-driven models for estimating the probability of high-concentration occurrence of naturally occurring radioactive materials in groundwater, J. Hydrol., 605, 127346.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127346
25

Kenda, K., Cerin, M., Bogataj, M., Senozetnik, M., Klemen, K., Pergar, P., Laspidou, C., and Mladenic, D., 2018, Groundwater modeling with machine learning techniques: ljubljana polje aquifer, Proceedings, 2(11), 697.

10.3390/proceedings2110697
26

Kim, G., Hwang, C., Shin, H., and Choi, M, 2019a, Applicability of groundwater recharge rate estimation method based on artificial neural networks in unmeasured areas, J. Geol. Soc. Korea, 55(6), 693-701.

10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.6.693
27

Kim, G., Kim, J., and Shin, H., 2019b, Estimation of groundwater usage for the living (domestic and business) purpose wells by using a regression tree method, J. Geol. Soc. Korea, 55(6), 683-691.

10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.6.683
28

Kim, I. and Lee, J., 2021, Performance analysis of ANN prediction for groundwater level considering regional‐specific influence components, Groundwater, 60(3), 344-361.

10.1111/gwat.13156
29

Kim, Y., Jeong, J., Park, H., Kwon, M., Cho, C., and Jeong, J., 2022, Development of a data-driven ensemble regressor and its applicability for identifying contextual and collective outliers in groundwater level time-series data, J. Hydrol., 612, 128127.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128127
30

Kong, Q., 2021, Deep Learning Based Approach to Integrate MyShake's Trigger Data with ShakeAlert for Faster and Robust EEW Alerts, Lawrence livermore national laboratory, LLNL-TR-830065.

10.2172/1836932
31

Kulabako, N.R., Nalubega, M., and Thunvik, R., 2007, Study of the impact of land use and hydrogeological settings on the shallow groundwater quality in a peri-urban area of Kampala, Uganda, Science of the Total Environment, 381(1-3), 180-199.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.035
32

Kundzewicz, Z. (Ed.)., 1995, New Uncertainty Concepts in Hydrology and Water Resources (International Hydrology Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511564482.

10.1017/CBO9780511564482
33

Lebron, L., Schaap, M.G., and Suarez, D.L., 1999, Saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction from microscopic pore geometry measurements and neural networks analysis, Water Resour. Res., 35(10), 3149-3158.

10.1029/1999WR900195
34

Lee, J., Kang, S., Kim, T., and Chun, G., 2018, Development of groundwater level monitoring and forecasting technique for drought analysis (II) – Groundwater drought forecasting using SPI, SGI and ANN, J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc., 51(11), 1021-1029.

35

Lee, S., Hyun, Y., and Lee, M., 2019, Groundwater potential mapping using data mining models of big data analysis in Goyang-si, South Korea, Sustainability, 11(6), 1678.

10.3390/su11061678
36

Lee, S., Jeong, J., Kim, M., Park, W., Kim, Y., Park, J., Park, H., Park, G., and Jeong, J., 2021, Data-driven analysis for developing the effective groundwater management system in Daejeong-Hangyeong watershed in Jeju Island, Econ. Environ. Geol., 54(3), 373-387.

10.9719/EEG.2021.54.3.373
37

Liu, L., Kuo, S.M., and Zhou, M., 2009, Virtual sensing techniques and their applications, 2009 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 31, doi:10.1109/ICNSC.2009.4919241

10.1109/ICNSC.2009.4919241
38

Majumdar, S., Smith, R., Butler Jr, J.J., and Lakshmi, V., 2020, Groundwater withdrawal prediction using integrated multitem-poral remote sensing data sets and machine learning, Water Resour. Res., 56(11), 11.

10.1029/2020WR028059
39

Malakar, P., Mukherjee, A., Bhanja, S.N., Ray, R. K., Sarkar, S., and Zahid, A., 2021, Machine-learning-based regional-scale groundwater level prediction using GRACE, Hydrogeol., 29(3), 1027-1042.

10.1007/s10040-021-02306-2
40

Najafabadipour, A., Kamali, G., and Nezamabadi-pour, H., 2022, Application of artificial intelligence techniques for the determination of groundwater level using spatio-temporal parameters, ACS Omega, 7(12), 10751-10764. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00536. 2c00536.

10.1021/acsomega.2c0053635382324PMC8973156
41

National Water Information System: Mapper, https://toolkit.climate.gov/tool/national-water-information-system-mapper, 2022-11-17.

42

NASA, 2019, Adavanced Information Systems Technology (AIST) Program, https://esto.nasa.gov/project-selections-for-aist-18/.

43

Nevo, S., Morin, E., Rosenthal, A.G., Metzger, A., Barshai, C., Weitzner, D., Voloshin, D., Kratzert, F., Elidan, G., Dror, G., Begelman, G., Nearing, G., Shalev, G., Noga, H., Shavitt, I., Yuk\-lea, L., Royz, M., Giladi, N., Levi, N.P., Reich, O., Gilon, O., Maor, R., Timnat, S., Shechter, T., Anisimov, V., Gigi, Y., Levin, Y., Moshe, Z., Ben-Haim, Z., Hassidim, A., and Matias, Y., 2021, Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4013-4032. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022

10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022
44

Neyens, D., Baisset, M., and Lovighi, H., 2018, Monitoring the groundwater quality/quantity from your desktop – application to salt water intrusion monitoring EMI: Environmental data Management Interface, E3S Web Conf., 54, 00021.

10.1051/e3sconf/20185400021
45

Nolan, B., Gronberg, J., Faunt, C., Eberts, S., and Belitz, K., 2014, Modeling nitrate at domestic and public-supply well depths in the central Valley, California, Environ. Technol., 48(10), 5643-5651.

10.1021/es405452q
46

Nolan, B., Fienen, M., and Lorenz, D., 2015, A statistical learning framework for groundwater nitrate models of the Central Valley, California, USA, J. Hydrol., 531, 902-911.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.025
47

Nova Scotia Real-Time Shallow Aquifer Monitoring Network, https://novascotia.ca/natr/meb/water-resources/aquifer-network.asp, 2022-11-21.

48

Paepae, T., Bokoro, P.N., and Kyamakya, K., 2021, From fully physical to virtual sensing for water quality assessment: a comprehensive review of the relevant state-of-the-art, Sensors, 21(21), 6971, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21216971.

10.3390/s2121697134770278PMC8587795
49

Park, S. and Jeong, G, 2021, Variation of seasonal groundwater recharge analyzed using Landsat-8 OLI data and a CART algo-rithm, Eng. Geol., 31(3), 395-432.

50

Podgorski, J., Labhasetwar, P., Saha, D., and Berg, M., 2018, Prediction modeling and mapping of groundwater fluoride contamination throughout India, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52(17), 9889-9898.

10.1021/acs.est.8b01679
51

Podgorski, J., Araya, D., and Berg, M., 2022, Geogenic managanese and iron in groundwater of Southeast Asia and Bangla-desh – Machine learning spatial prediction modeling and comparison with arsenic, Sci. Total Environ., 833, 155131.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155131
52

Ransom, K.M., Nolan, B.T., Stackelberg, P.E., Belitz, K., and Fram, M.S., 2022, Machine learning predictions of nitrate in groundwater used for drinking supply in the conterminous United States, Sci. Total Environ., 807, 151065.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151065
53

Rizzo, D.M. and Dougherty, D.E., 1994, Characterization of aquifer properties using artificial neural networks: Neural kriging, Water Resour. Res., 302(2), 483-497.

10.1029/93WR02477
54

Sahoo, S., Russo, T., Elliott, J., and Foster, I., 2017, Machine learning algorithms for modeling groundwater level changes in agricultural regions of the U.S., Water Resour. Res., 53(5), 3878-3895.

10.1002/2016WR019933
55

Schleder, G., Padilha, A., Acosta, C., Costa, M., and Fazzio, A., 2019, From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science-a review, J. Phys. Mater., 2(11), 032001.

10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b
56

Senozetnik, M., Herga, Z., Subic, T., Bradesko, L., Kenda, K., Klemen, K., Pergar, P., and Mladenic, D., 2018, IoT middle-ware for water management, Proceedings, 2, 696.

10.3390/proceedings2110696
57

Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C.J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., and Hassabis, D., 2016, Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search, Nature, 529(28), 484-489.

10.1038/nature16961
58

Stackelberg, P.E., Belitz, K., Brown, C.J., Erickson, M.L., Elliott, S.M., Kauffman, L.J., Ransom, K.M., and Reddy, J.E., 2021, Machine learning predictions of pH in the glacial aquifer system, northern USA, Groundwater, 59(3), 352-368.

10.1111/gwat.1306333314084PMC8246943
59

Stigter, T.Y., Ribeiro, L., and Carvalho Dill, A.M.M., 2006, Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinization and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal, Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 79-99.

10.1007/s10040-004-0396-3
60

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), 2019 Digital twins for the next generation of geoscience prediction and understanding: OneGeology 4.0., http://www.onegeology.org/docs/newsEvents/digital-Twin-leaflet.pdf.

61

Vu, M.T., Jardani, A., Massei, N., and Fournier, M., 2021, Reconstruction of missing groundwater level data by using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deep neural network, J. Hydrol., 597, 125776.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125776
62

Wadekar, S., Vakare, V., Prajapati, R., Yadav, S., and Yadav, V., 2016, Smart water management using IOT, IEEE, doi: 10.1109/WECON.2016.7993425

10.1109/WECON.2016.7993425
63

Yoon, H., Jun, S.-C., Hyun, Y., Bae, G.-O., and Lee, K.-K., 2011, A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer, J. Hydrol., 396(1-2), 128-138.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.002
64

Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, M., and Yang, J., 2018, Developing a long short-term memory (LSTM) based model for predicting water table depth in agricultural areas, J. Hydrol., 561, 918-929.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.065
65

Zhou, T., Wang, F., and Yang, Z., 2017, Comparative analysis of ANN and SVM models combined with wavelet preprocess for groundwater depth prediction, Water, 9(10), 781.

10.3390/w9100781
66

Zounemat-Kermani, M., Batelaan, O., Fadaee, M., and Hinkel-mann, R., 2021, Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review, J. Hydrol., 598, 126266.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126266
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지하수토양환경학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
  • Journal Title(Ko) :지하수토양환경
  • Volume : 28
  • No :1
  • Pages :18-39
  • Received Date : 2022-10-20
  • Revised Date : 2022-11-03
  • Accepted Date : 2022-11-17