All Issue

2014 Vol.19, Issue 4 Preview Page
30 September 2014. pp. 52 ~ 61
Abstract
Metal concentrations in the former Janghang smelter area were determined and human health risk of arsenic (As) with bioaccessibility was investigated. Site investigation of the area within 1.5 km from the Janghang smelter showed the As concentrations of 4.8~169.8 mg/kg (avg. 37.8 mg/kg). For 85 samples out of 126 samples, As concentrations were higher than the Worrisome Level of the Korean Soil and Environment Conservation Act, and seven samples exceeded the Countermeasure Standard. Risk assessment for As incorporated with the bioaccessibility revealed that potential human health risk of the carcinogenic ($1.8{\sim}5.0{\times}10^{-5}$) was above the acceptable risk range ($10^{-5}{\sim}10^{-6}$) while the risk of the non-carcinogenic was not found. Remediation goals based on risk incorporated with bioaccessibility of As ranged from 10.8 to 20.0 mg/kg. Such difference in the remediation goals resulted from various bioaccessibility of As (i.e., between 8.7~66.3%) at the study site.

References
  1. Adriano, D.C., 2001, Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment, 2nd ed, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 255 p.
  2. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry), 2014, Priority List of Hazardous Substances, available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/.
  3. Basta, N.T., Foster, J.N., Dayton, E.A., Rodriguez, R.R., and Casteel, S.W., 2007, The effect of dosing vehicle on arsenic bioaccessibility in smelter-contaminated soils, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A, 42(9), 1275-1281.
  4. Bradham, K.D., Scheckel, K.G., Nelson, C.M., Seales, P.E., Lee, G.E., Hughes, M.F., Miller, B.W., Yeow, A., Gilmore, T., Serda, S.M., Harper, S., and Thomas, D.J., 2011, Relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility and speciation of arsenic in contaminated soils, Environ. Health Perspect., 119(11), 1629-1634.10.1289/ehp.1003352
  5. Brattin, W., Drexler, J., Lowney, Y., Griffin, S., Diamond, G., and Woodbury, L., 2013, An in vitro method for estimation of arsenic relative bioavailability in soil, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A, 76(7), 458-478.10.1080/15287394.2013.771765
  6. Dermont, G., Bergeron, M., Mercier, G., and Richer-Laflche, M., 2008, Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications, J. Hazard. Mater., 152(1), 1-31.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043
  7. Juhasz, A.L., Weber, J., Smith, E., Naidu, R., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., and Sansom, L., 2009, Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated Soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(24), 9487-9494.10.1021/es902427y
  8. KECO (Korea Environment Corporation), 2008, Detailed Soil Servey Report for Former Janahang Smelter Area.
  9. Kelley, M.E., Brauning, S., Schoof, R., and Ruby, M., 2002, Assessing Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soil, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, USA, 75-85 p.
  10. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment), 2009, Official Test Methods of Soil Quality, 2009-255.
  11. KMOE, 2010, Detailed Soil Survey Guidance, 2010-104.
  12. KMOE, 2011, Soil Contaminant Risk Assessment Guidance, 2011-139.
  13. Rodriguez, R.R., Basta, N.T., Casteel, S.W., and Pace, L.W., 1999, An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(4), 642-649.10.1021/es980631h
  14. Ruby, M.V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., and Sellstone, C.M., 1996, Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a Physiologically Based Extraction Test, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30(2), 422-430.10.1021/es950057z
  15. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1989, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/1-89/002.
  16. USEPA, 1992, Guidelines for Exposure Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/600/Z-92/001.
  17. USEPA, 2004, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, EPA/540/R/99/005.
  18. USEPA, 2007, Guidance for Evaluating the Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soils for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9285.7-80.
  19. USEPA, 2011, ProUCL 4.1 software, available at http://www.epa.gov/osp/hstl/tsc/software.htm.
  20. USEPA, 2012a, Compilation and Review of Data on Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9200.1-113.
  21. USEPA, 2012b, Recommendations for Default Value for Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA, OSWER 9200.1-113.
  22. USEPA, 2014, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), available at http://www.epa.gov/iris/.
  23. USEPA Region 8, 2012, Standard Operating Procedure, In Vitro Bioacessibility (IVBA) Procedure for Arsenic.
  24. WHO (World Health Organization), 2014, Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지하수토양환경학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
  • Journal Title(Ko) :지하수토양환경
  • Volume : 19
  • No :4
  • Pages :52 ~ 61